I'd like to say a few words MaDong due
Finish see cctv1 zhao4 ben3 shan skit < > your desk mate after felt disappointed, total feel this works from the creation idea is not new, without the punchline, no sense of humor. Later, in the browsing relevant cctv1 content, happened to see a professor at national tsing hua university XiaoYing write < cctv1 director mo learn Sue purple purple > and < cctv1 director of MaDong name legalist from where learn to > penny and MaDong response articles, this thinking as tsinghua university professor of aesthetic XiaoYing would be certain to zhao4 ben3 shan skit evaluating adequately, to CCTV improvement program will put forward cctv1 vision, unexpectedly after see was completely out of my expectation, call XiaoYing where is in evaluating zhao4 ben3 shan skit cctv1 programs of CCTV improvement for an opinion, is entirely on CCTV cctv1 MaDong personal attack, the director is still a bit scholars demeanor. Hence, involuntarily want to speak a few words MaDong due. But MaDong backstroking of some enough reason. But I think the issue XiaoYing who instigates or. For MaDong, XiaoYing I all incognizant, MaDong because of his status and often see in CCTV, and he understand somewhat. I told them two people without any bias or jotham care. And simple XiaoYing and MaDong debate will talk about my opinions.
A, what is MaDong high-handed or XiaoYing bullied?
I watched XiaoYing criticism that MaDong articles, XiaoYing dissatisfaction from last year after the beginning of cctv1, when he and, WangXuMing both for zhao4 ben3 shan of sketch specialists have intense criticism, and CCTV was not adopted their opinions, this year the continued to zhao4 ben3 shan cctv1, this is XiaoYing write articles critical MaDong main reasons. I saw the article lift eye the one of MaDong cctv1 director of bossy from where learn?" Can't help produced some thoughts. Festival gala broadcast, people to the program after commenting, pointing this is more than just normal. I will speak, start watching "Jane's you" I also felt disappointed, very dissatisfied. But as viewers, normal thinking is so two steps: the first step is to work itself evaluation, looking for trouble, even parity again low or negate are understandable; The second step is to improve the quality of programs of CCTV improvement, bring forward comments and Suggestions, these opinions and build meaning propose the acerbic again, CCTV is also should listen to and have no reason to refuse.
As an expert, normal thinking is nothing is so called two steps. So CCTV as a mainstream media, the party broadcast, note modestly listens attentively to a vast audience's opinions and Suggestions, to improve the party's preparations for the next year, and constantly improve the quality of programs is obligatory, this also is the masses have common desire. But on the other hand, in the face of a party cab audience, face different opinions and Suggestions on how to choose, how to improve, it is not an easy thing.
XiaoYing the problem with no pinpoint their location, though you with dual identity, both experts and audience, whether a person or three people, or represent more academic elite, compared with CCTV cctv1 organizer after is an outsider. CCTV, the central media, the selection of program, the program is a selection rules and procedures, which the audience, which is not a few experts put forward what opinion is necessary adopted, and this is not MaDong one thing. Even if MaDong in choosing zhao4 ben3 shan on cctv1 plays a leading role, that he is normal in performing their duties, is his part of the matter, And XiaoYing whether you again big experts, how many experts, representing here will belong to the outsider, your opinion only for reference, face so large audiences and expert group, every audience and expert puts forward opinions are adopted is impossible, for it must have a correct understanding of it.
As you arrange your teaching, scientific research, bring your students are your responsibilities, MaDong to give you an opinion and the suggestion is ok, let you must like this, so you also must be impossible to accept is same. Although CCTV as a nationwide audience's media and you make teaching depending on the nature of the concept, but the duty is same, cooperatively? By rights, these are all ordinary but common sense. Your mistake is that didn't make this duty relationship, CCTV does not accept your opinion is not, you will write articles on CCTV director attack even insult, it should not be a famous big professor should do, you say MaDong bossy, as if you more outrageous.
No comments:
Post a Comment