If is to choose the March 4 cosmetic brand price

Inflation haze ummanned isn't unusual, prices. But four cosmetic brand collective price hikes, can't help letting person anxiety and doubt its motives. Cosmetic products and real life cannot be separated, including the anxiety caused by price no less salt sauce vinegar; Due to the four cosmetic brand market share reaches as high as 80%, the collective prices will certainly make public feel monopoly suspect.

 

Although, cost-effective consumer calculate a bill, according to now rise, zhenwei daily consumption spending part of it isn't much, without much impact of daily life. However, if these brand wash not to drop monopoly, so no scruples about suspected to will not only affect price undertakes after all, its market reputation, but also could cause other commodities, rising to help frittering macroeconomic and microcosmic minsheng bring double negative impacts.

 

In fact, with four cosmetic products mostly byproduct of petrochemical products in international oil prices continue to rise to a hundred dollars a barrel, plus high of intermediate links of freight costs increase pulling, and Libya war and the influence of instability in the Middle East, affected by various factors conduction and send prices are reasonable. But the reasonable price, market transmission rise, need a open and transparent way, namely each big well-known brand retailers and consumers to household that reasons for the rise, public cost, obtain the understanding retailers and consumers.

 

Four daily brand has not done so. Moreover, it also exists bigger market paradoxical. Because Japan market competition is intense, the market between big brands subordinate to let a person too many things to see. This can be all kinds of ads from a snapshot clue. In addition to this bad factors of the quality evaluation, the key is price, can say prices in the market, often, a price and coordinate the three onlookers, prices rather miserably.

 

Public doubts just here, if four brand to the public cheap uggs is good for u in any collective after price reason clear price, public discontent but can also be "though understanding" accept; The problem is not given any a prices are tangible reason, "public" in raw material price just four brand given fuzzy reasons. So, such collective prices in public opinion has overtones of monopoly alliance. Of course, in the market of the four brand also fighting evil plot darkroom impossible. The biggest is probably a markup, a few other also follow suit. But this kind of cosmetic products in the market to follow, the consumer's point of view on the damage of free competition market principles. In a market sensitive inflation expectations, follow suit under market main body, the rise in the audience seems is troublemaker, is the cause of market stress troublemakers.

 

More crucially, oil prices are not begin now. Why four cosmetic brand in April to drive price? The public will inevitably and "two" and "3 · 15" that links: the former, inflation and the price is representing members of hot debate topics; The latter, was exposed all kinds of goods and safeguarding consumers' rights and interests of the special days. If is to choose the March 4 cosmetic brand price, I'm afraid will face much greater pressure of public opinion. The disadvantages, and chase interest, is the market main body instinct. But the timing of the four brand price, unavoidable make broad consumer peeped into its too opportunistic the ecru. Unbearable, then in March, p&g, loreal eight companies for suspected monopoly and 50 million euro drawn by Spain's huge fines.

 

In the Chinese market, and these cosmetic brand of river's lake guies, because the collective prices are filled with wash not to drop the monopoly of the suspect. As long as the public is suspected, regulators had a monopoly to restart the survey?